人民论坛

小溪细水汇集而成形成汹涌的大海洋

(中/英文版)Teo Soh Lung: Terrex Saga 张素兰:装甲车门

留下评论

9架装甲车被香港海关扣押装甲车门另一章!

本文章导读:

黄永宏说,中国香港特区政府扣押9辆装甲车与香港特区政府要求要求船务公司答复是两码事!

中国香港特区政府继续扣押9辆装甲车等同于侵犯新加坡国家主权!这是违反国际公法的!

老祖宗说,针插在你的身上,才知道什么疼的味道?!

本文章作者就此提出自己和鄞玉林两人在2015911日武吉巴督补选过后,选举句指控他们倆违法选举条例有关在冷静日不准补选的政党党员在网上或者社交媒体讨论有关补选事宜!

结果警察叔叔把他们倆都叫协助调查!过后他们倆的个人随身携带电脑、手机和电脑桌机都被警察叔叔扣押了!

警察叔叔至今尚未归还她!理由是她拒绝提供有关电子设备的个人密码!

不知道行动党政府这样做法是否算是违反新加坡宪法约定下的言论自由?是否算违法联合国人权委员会释义的违法人权的约定!

 ××××××××××××××××××××

 张素兰:装甲车门

(转载自网址:https://www.facebook.com/sohlung.teo/posts/10210631624920649

我在观看了黄永宏部长于201719日在国会的的讲话(见网址:http://www.channelnewsasia.com/…/ng-eng-hen-s…/3424598.html…#),对于政府处理9辆装甲车和其他设备的手法,我无助地感到失望。众所周知的是,他们把问题推给了香港特区政府,并确定了自己听取了法律专业意见,“即便是(9辆装甲车)是通过商务储物柜是否在运载的,但是,它们仍然是受到主权国的国际法保护的。)”假设对于法律专业意见是这样的充满确定的信心,那么。为什么总理需要写信给香港特区政府首长梁振英“强调同样的信息”呢?为什么还要劳驾新加坡驻香港领事对(9辆装甲车)事件施压呢?为什么进行半心半意的外交活动,而不是直接提取诉讼呢?

部长说,香港特区政府“负有责任继续进行调查(9辆装甲车)事件。这将需要一段时间才能完成,香港特区政府将会依照香港特区政府的法律进行专项调查工作。”

鉴于此,新加坡政府最佳的做法是静候佳音。对于香港特区政府而言,用两个月进行调查时间和决定是否可以归还、或者扣押或者充公我们的国家资产是太短暂的。

我之所以这么说,

那是因为新加坡政府至今尚未完成对在去年武吉巴督补选冷静日指控一些社会运动分子的调查工作。专项调查工作已经超过了7个月了。他们被警方拿走的电脑和手机等三人资产仍然在警方的扣押中。新加坡政府咋能期盼香港特区政府在这么短暂的时间里做出决定是否归还、扣押或者充公价值3千万元我们国的家资产呢?

耐心点吧!服一点药吧!谦虚地向人民展现自己吧!

部长在回答国会议员的询问时说,这9辆装甲车是可以在公开市场购买到。它们并没有存在任何军事机密。这是可以确定的。我们无法任何途径去确定部长在国会里的承诺保证。但是我对于有关的承诺保证保留意见。

政府是否获得任何专业意见,

被扣押(的9辆装甲车)最终是否会导致被一个怀有敌意或者友好国家都是会获得保险公司赔偿的?这(9架装甲车)的被扣押是否会豁免于类似那些在保险条款里列明为属于“不可抗拒”(“act of God”)条款项下?与此同时,这(9架装甲车)设备的投保额是多少?

据说,这9架装甲车和军事设备是没有列明在集装箱船总装货单(the manifest)里。以前一路来是不是也是这样处理的?依据是所知,一般货物的码头是不允许载有类似(9架装甲车)这样性质的车辆和军事设备停泊靠岸的。因为一旦这些货物发生爆炸之类的情况,香港的货柜码头将面对因为可能会被炸毁而消失的不可预见的潜在危险。假设这 个说法是存在的,那么,这批货物的投保保单是否还有效呢?

部长宣称,国防部使用商业集装箱船运载的军事设备是不寻常的。我们有自己的国家船务公司船队——海皇船务集团(NOL)(达飞轮船正式启动收购海皇轮船http://www.eworldship.com/html/2016/ShipOwner_0607/116115.html)在运载国防部的军事设备直到它被法国达飞轮船(CMA CGM)所收购。对于APL来说,它从来就没有遇到过类似的情况。这是不幸的。但是,APL面对事实是:

它是否会对新加坡政府的索赔进行抗辩呢?

接下来,如果这香港特区政府在审查了过去档案资料发现未按照正常申报程序,是否会使问题更加复杂化?

%e8%a3%85%e7%94%b2%e8%bd%a6%e9%97%a8%ef%bc%88%e4%b8%ad%e6%96%87%ef%bc%89

Teo Soh Lung Terrex Saga

 (https://www.facebook.com/sohlung.teo/posts/10210631624920649

As I watched this video of Minister Ng Eng Hen in parliament on 9 Jan 2017 http://www.channelnewsasia.com/…/ng-eng-hen-s…/3424598.html…# I cannot help feeling disappointed at how our government handles the detention of our 9 Terrex vehicles and other equipment. All it knows is throwing the law at Hong Kong and assuring itself that it had received legal advice that the equipment are “protected by sovereign immunity even though they are being shipped by commercial carriers.” If it is so confident that the advice given by its legal advisers is right, then why involve the prime minister in writing a letter to the Chief Executive Leung Chun-ying to “reiterate the same message”? Why bother to get our Consul General in Hong Kong to press the issue? Why not just sue instead of engaging in half hearted diplomacy?

The minister said that the Hong Kong authorities “have responded that the investigation is ongoing and will take some time to complete and that the Hong Kong government will handle the matter in accordance with their laws.”

It is best that the Singapore government sit back and wait. Two months is too short a time for the Hong Kong authorities to investigate and decide whether to release, detain or confiscate our property.

I say this because the Singapore authority has still not completed its investigation of Cooling Off Day offences allegedly committed by several activists even after more than 7 months. It is still holding on to several personal computers and mobile phones it seized from them. These are worth several thousand dollars. How then can it expect the Hong Kong authorities to decide whether to release, detain or confiscate S$30 million worth of our property? The government must be realistic. Be patient.

Eat a bit of the medicine it dishes out to the people every day and be humble.

In answer to several questions raised by MPs, the minister assured us that the 9 Terrex vehicles can be purchased in the open market, contain no classified information and are insured. We have no means of testing the accuracy of these statements. But I have questions pertaining to insurance.

Has the government been advised that a seizure resulting in a forfeiture of the property by a hostile or friendly country will also be covered by insurance? Will this exempt the insurer from liability under similar exemptions classified as “act of God” or even specifically exempted in the insurance policy? And how much were the equipment insured for?

There are rumours that the Terrex vehicles and military equipment were not declared in the manifest. Has this been the practice? I am told that no ordinary port would allow a carrier with such vehicles and equipment to berth if there was such a declaration because they pose a danger. What if these goods contain explosives and an accident occur. Hong Kong harbour will be blown out of existence! If this is true, will the insurance policy be voided.

The minister has declared that it is not unusual for SAF to transport military equipment using commercial carriers. We have been using our own carrier, NOL to transport military equipment until it was sold to Compagnie des Messagenes Marltines(CMM) & Compagnie Generale Transatlanonque  (“CMA CGM”). So we were very lucky in the past. It is just bad luck that APL has now to face the consequences. But will this fact give APL a defence to the government’s claim? And what if China checks the documentation for the past years for irregularities? Will our troubles be multiplied?

%e8%a3%85%e7%94%b2%e8%bd%a6%e9%97%a8%ef%bc%88%e8%8b%b1%e6%96%87%ef%bc%89

相关链接:

1. 《人民论坛》:《热烈祝贺行动党政府的外交形象已经从李光耀的老鸨和婊子外交成功转型为侏儒外交》

https://wangruirong.wordpress.com/2017/01/10/

2.  香港媒体:我国九辆装甲车突然离奇消失了

http://www.channel8news.sg/news8/latestnews/20170102-sg-terrex/3408810.html?cid=ch8news-fb

3. 《8频道新闻》已就有关报道,向新加坡国防部进行查询。

【更新】新加坡国防部答复《8频道新闻》的询问时表示:我们期待能圆满解决这起事件,并且等待香港政府归还我们的资产。当局没有提供进一步的详情。

4. 《南洋视窗》《新加坡外长谈新中关系:不让局势恶化,不逆来顺受

http://news.nanyangpost.com/2017/01/2_61.html4.

5. 《凤凰网》《港媒称被扣新加坡装甲车消失外交部回应》

http://news.ifeng.com/a/20170103/50516140_0.shtml

6. 《观察网》《香港海关回应“被扣新加坡装甲车消失”:移入室内》

http://www.guancha.cn/Neighbors/2017_01_03_387371.shtml

7. 《人民论坛》《海上九头鸟、海底无人气”——两场不同结局的外交戏目!》

https://wangruirong.wordpress.com/2016/12/29/

8. 《人民论坛》《冬至到了,行动党政府的外交账本满江红!》

https://wangruirong.wordpress.com/2016/12/21/

9.  《人民论坛》《行动党政府难海翻船、捅伤中国》

https://wangruirong.wordpress.com/2016/12/11/

10. 《人民论坛》《一场精彩绝伦高智商与低能儿的外交较劲——行动党政府一手抱着红玫瑰、心里同时想着牡丹花!!》

https://wangruirong.wordpress.com/2016/12/03/

11. 《人民论坛》《李显龙和维文的外交政策是拉屎的不认错、放屁的遭殃!》

https://wangruirong.wordpress.com/2016/11/28/

12.  《人民论坛》《强权不能视为公理!真的吗?——在行动党的霸道统治下强权绝对是公理!老百姓诉求绝对是无理!》

https://wangruirong.wordpress.com/2014/07/02/

13.  《人民论坛》《李光耀国际老鸨业务即日起停止营业!——李显龙不是干国际老鸨生意的料子》

https://wangruirong.wordpress.com/2016/10/03/

 

Advertisements

发表评论

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / 更改 )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / 更改 )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / 更改 )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / 更改 )

Connecting to %s