人民论坛

小溪细水汇集而成形成汹涌的大海洋

(中英文版)新加坡民主党致函总检察长:调查有关指责李总理滥权 Singapore Democratic Party calls upon AGC for investigation on allegations against PM Lee

留下评论

新加坡民主党致函总检察长:

调查有关指责李总理滥权

日期:201777

新加坡总检察长

总检察署

门派:1 号,霹麒麟街上段

邮区058288

黄鲁胜先生

敬启者:

事项:关于调查总理李显龙被指控事宜

阁下可能已经获悉,有关李伟玲医生和李显扬先生已经指控,李显龙先生以新加坡共和国总理的身份滥用职权事宜。

特别是,总理的弟妹通过个别或者联合的形式对总理进行类似如下的指控。

1.总理在国会做了“虚假申明”

李伟玲医生和李显扬先生于201774日在脸书hereFACEBOOK)个人网页上,指控说:“李显龙关于李光耀的遗愿做出了令人费解,但最终是虚假的申述。”

他们的这项指控是指李显龙于2017年7月3日在国会的讲话。当时李显龙说,已故总理已经改变了他对38号欧思礼路拆除的立场了。他同意保留这栋建筑物。李伟玲和李显扬提出了有关(李光耀)的邮件支持了自己说法。

2.何晶没有任何法定身份可以代表总理公署

李显扬先生于2017622日在他的脸书(FACEBOOK 个人网页here里说,李显龙的妻子何晶女士到过38号欧思礼路住宅拿走了一些物件,她把这些物件交给了国家遗产文物局。李显扬先生指出,何晶并不是民选官员或者是是受总理公署官方委任的官员。但是,她却署名“总理公署联系代表”的职称。

与此同时,李显扬先生在他的脸书(FACEBOOK)个人网页里同时说,他本人和李伟玲医生是李光耀遗产执行人,何晶并没有事先征得他们的同意却从故居里拿走任何物件。李显扬先生把何晶的这种行为描述为“盗贼和干预家事”行为。

3.李显龙对于赠与展现了不适当的行为

李显扬先生于2017622日在自己的脸书FACEBOOK个人网页里here写到,李显龙说,自己以总理的身份已经取得了赠与契约。但是,他却以个人的身份对李伟玲医生和李显扬先生采取了法律行为。

4.关于委任成立部长委员会是值得质疑的

李显扬和李伟玲声称:李显龙在与他們簽署有关李光耀遺產之执行管理的协议后还进一步发布有关秘密的部長委员会的法定公报。部長委員会的設立显然是为了挑战李光耀的遗嘱,而不是如所宣称的目的在于探索欧思礼路的不同选项。政府并没有向他们提供有关这个委员会的信息,直至他们对外提出有关的指责。委員会成立至今尚未清楚说明。

犹有甚者,李伟玲医生和李显扬先生也申明here,有关李光耀对欧思礼路故居的立场。李显龙于20154月份在国会向部长委员会发表自己的法定宣誓声明时说,“李光耀的立场上在过去几年未曾改变过,和他充分地体现了其价值观”

上述对李伟玲医生和李显扬先生对李显龙的指控是极其显见的,总检察长应该予以重视。尽管李显龙已经在201773日和4日在国会说明了一些问题。他的声明必须是视为是属于其政党的看法,那是因为这不是属于在法院进行交叉盘问下进行的。李显龙已经拒绝了公众要求设立一个调查委员会的呼吁。

为了法治与诚信的利益,在不受任何一方的操纵下,对有关的指控和双方达的互相指控进行调查,是展现我们的国家确实落实司法制度。

为此,我们呼吁总检察署在自己力所能及的权利范围内或者指示执法单位召唤所有有关各方证人和收集相关的文件,彻底解决这个问题。总检察署进行调查的结果和行动必须是拥有相关的证据和其他的考量的。

由于最近您的被委任为总检察长的职位和把有关工作分配给副总检察长余文正Yee Woon Chin先生去处理,所引发了一些议论,对于您来说,最重要的是,应该避免本身参与处理这个问题。我们反对委任哈里古玛先生为另一位副总检察长。因为他曾经是人民行动党的国会议员,与该当有着长期密切的关系。

我们相信,在把维护国家最高利益下,您将会把这件事视为最紧急与首要的大事处理。我们期待您的回覆,

您的忠实的

新加坡民主党秘书长

徐顺全

 

Singapore Democratic Party

calls upon AGC for investigation on allegations against PM Lee

7 July 2017

Mr Lucien Wong
Attorney-General
Attorney-General’s Chambers
1 Upper Pickering St
Singapore 058288
Email: agc@agc.gov.sg.

Dear sir,

INVESTIGATION INTO ALLEGATIONS MADE AGAINST PM LEE HSIEN LOONG

As you may know, Dr Lee Wei Ling (“LWL”) and Mr Lee Hsien Yang (“LHY”) have accused Mr Lee Hsien Loong (“LHL”) of abuse of power in his capacity as Prime Minister of Singapore.

Specifically, PM Lee’s siblings, individually or jointly, noted that:

  1. PM Lee Hsien Loong had made “false claims” in Parliament

In their Facebook post on 4 July 2017 here, LWL and LHY made a grave charge that “LHL has made convoluted, but ultimately false claims about Lee Kuan Yew’s (“LKY”) wishes.” They were referring to LHL’s Parliamentary speech on 3 July 2017 where LHL stated that the late Lee Kuan Yew had changed his position from demolishing his house, 38 Oxley Road, to preserving it. LWL and LHY have produced emails to substantiate their claim.

  1. Ho Ching had no business acting on behalf of the Prime Minister’s Office (PMO)

LHY posted on his Facebook on 22 June here that Ms Ho Ching (“HC”), LHL’s wife, had gone to 38 Oxley Road to remove items in the residence and handed them over to the National Heritage Board. LHY pointed out that Ms Ho was not an elected official nor was she an appointed officer of the PMO and yet she was listed as the “contact representative for the PMO”.

In addition, LHY stated in his post that HC did not seek permission from him and LWL as executors of LKY’s Estate to remove items from the house. This, he said, constituted “theft and intermeddling”.

  1. LHL acted inappropriately on the Deed of Gift

LHY stated in his Facebook post on 22 June 2017 here that LHL had obtained the Deed of Gift in his capacity as Prime Minister but used it in his personal capacity to take legal action against LWL and LHY.

  1. The appointment of the Ministerial Committee was questionable

LHY and LWL have stated that LHL, after signing a settlement agreement with them as executors of LKY’s estate, went on to make a statutory declaration to a secret Ministerial Committee which appeared to have been established to challenge Mr LKY’s will instead of its professed objective of exploring options for the Oxley house. The details of this committee were not provided to them until they went public with their accusations and the origins of the committee have not been clarified to date.

Furthermore, LWL and LHY have claimed here that, with regard to LKY’s position on the Oxley House, LHL’s statutory declaration to the Ministerial Committee contradicts his own statement to Parliament in April 2015 where LHL said LKY’s position was “unwavering over the years and fully consistent with his lifelong values.”

The above are allegations made against LHL that, prima facie, warrant looking into by the Attorney-General’s Chambers (AGC). Even though LHL has addressed some of these matters in Parliament on 3 and 4 July 2017, his statements must necessarily be viewed as partisan as they were not subject to critical cross-examination. He has also refused to convene a Commission of Inquiry despite widespread calls from the public to do so.

In the interest of the rule of law and accountability, it is imperative that our legal system demonstrates impartiality by investigating the allegations and counter-allegations by the parties involved without fear of favour.

As such, we call on the AGC to do whatever is within its powers or to direct law enforcement agencies to interview all relevant witnesses and subpoena necessary documents to get to the bottom of the matter. The outcome of the investigation and action(s) led by the AGC should be guided by the evidence and no other consideration.

As there have been questions raised regarding your recent appointment as Attorney-General, it is crucial that you recuse yourself from dealing with this matter and assign the job to Deputy AG Lionel Yee Woon Chin. We also advise against appointing your other Deputy AG, Mr Hri Kumar, to look into the matter given his long association with the People’s Action Party as a member of parliament.

We trust that you will give this matter your urgent and utmost attention as the standing of our nation is at stake. We look forward to your response.

Sincerely yours,

Chee Soon Juan

Secretary-General
Singapore Democratic Party

Advertisements

发表评论

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / 更改 )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / 更改 )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / 更改 )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / 更改 )

Connecting to %s